If you're new here, you can subscribe to our RSS feed, receive e-mails and/or sign up to receive our FREE monthly newsletter, The Good Ship Mom&Pop . Welcome aboard - thanks for visiting! |
Entering the Fray:
The Homeschooling Is Undemocratic Myth
By Linda Dobson
At first, I figured the article on Slate by Dana Goldstein was so oddly perverse that if I quietly ignored it, it would go away. No such luck. Days later and the slash-and-burn homeschooling article still gets the goat of many, me included.
That someone in the year 2012 is still willing to perpetuate myths about homeschooling is disturbing. If critics choose to ignore decades of homeschooling practice – liberally sprinkled with homeschooling success and happiness – it’s their problem, that is, until they try to spread their ignorance on to unsuspecting others.
Please keep in mind that the following was written in 1995. That’s right; this nonsense has been around for a long, long time. It’s time folks, especially journalists (and I use that term loosely in this case), educate themselves, if not about homeschooling specifics, at least about the fact that they have no right to determine what is educationally best for other people’s children. They need to educate themselves about the harm daily inflicted on our children as they are compelled to endure institutionalized living during their formative years. They need to educate themselves about the origins and purpose of this institutionalized living so they realize some parents choose not to sacrifice their children on the altar of conditioning. Children first; institution preservation last. A good place to start is with John Taylor Gatto’s The Underground History of American Education, readily available FREE online to anyone willing to look around.
Please forgive me if I seem angry, but I know who should make important, life altering or life saving decisions about individual children. It isn’t Goldstein, and following her advice is dangerous to children, and to our country. At the same time, I remain optimistic as increasing numbers of families recognize truth, act upon it, and join the homeschooling community.
UPDATE: I’ve read Goldstein’s response and further explanation of her “thinking.” She obviously has been well-conditioned.
Myth #5: Homeschooling is undemocratic.
Homeschooling fault-finders have had a lot of fun tossing this myth about.
The only rationale I can find for this blatant lie is that critics, most likely A-
students from government-sponsored universities, consider the status quo
democracy. Therefore, any action that bypasses or, in their perspective,
threatens the status quo must be undemocratic.
Many critics fondly quote Thomas Jefferson who, after witnessing the
horror of the French revolution, renewed his commitment to an informed
citizenship. The part of Jefferson’s beliefs that critics forget is his
commitment to “reason and free inquiry [as] the only effectual agents
against error.”
To assume, and then further build an argument for 1990’s public
education on Jefferson’s vision of an informed citizenship is, once again,
commencing from a wrong starting place. For Jefferson, reason and free
inquiry were essential ingredients of education. The lack of these qualities
in 20th century public education is painfully evident everywhere from
politics to economics to religion to our family lives and everything in
between.
Homeschooling and Opportunity for Jefferson’s Free Inquiry
Family centered learning provides its students (and teachers) a rare
opportunity for free inquiry. Unshackled from dogma, propaganda,
watered-down textbooks, conformity, learned dependence, behavior
modification and politically correct teachers, inquiry is free. Free inquiry
must occur if we are to learn how to freely think. Free thinking must occur
if we are to be truly educated. True education must occur if we hope to ever
find our way back to a society capable of free inquiry.
A good professor is a bastard perverse enough to think what he
thinks is important, not what government thinks is important.”
– Edward C. Banfield
Professor of Government, Harvard University
Public School, Not Homeschooling, Is Undemocratic and Worse
I can’t think of any educational approach more undemocratic than public
school. From its more innocuous practices – telling you where to sit, stand
and take your place in line; what books to read; what days you must show
up; when to talk, change rooms, eat, and relieve yourself; to its spirit-
destroying teachings – you are in competition with and cannot trust your
classmates; you cannot trust your own thoughts so we will give you ours;
you must be graded, scrutinized and, if necessary, humiliated; you must
respond to reward and punishment; you must enter the acquisition race and
shun the spiritual – public schooling is worse than undemocratic. It rapes
young minds and murders human spirit. It is society-sanctioned child abuse.
The freedom necessary to inquire and reason is alive and well and
growing in America – in family centered educators’ homes. The practice
does, in fact, by-pass the status quo. If you believe the higher estimates of
current practitioners (and factor in homeschooling’s phenomenal growth
rate), it does, in fact, threaten the status quo. But at the same time it is one
of the purest practices of democracy alive today.
It is up to you to decide for yourself if the status quo – a failing national
education system that U.S. Secretary of Education Richard Riley questions
“whether [it is] changing fast enough to save and educate this generation of
young people” – is worth protecting. The price for this protection, we’re
finding, is your family’s very life, liberty, and pursuit of meaningful
happiness.
As the happiness of the people is the sole end of government, so the
consent of the people is the only foundation of it.
– John Adams